Koska minulla ei taaskaan ole mitään tähdellistä sanottavaa, lainaan netissä silmään osuneen keskustelun tänne. Amerikkalainen asianajaja kyselee siinä erinäisiä asioita todistajalta:
>__Lawyer:__ “Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?”
>__Witness:__ “No.”
>__Lawyer:__ “Did you check for blood pressure?”
>__Witness:__ “No.”
>__Lawyer:__ “Did you check for breathing?”
>__Witness:__ “No.”
>__Lawyer:__ “So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?”
>__Witness:__ “No.”
>__Lawyer:__ “How can you be so sure, Doctor?”
>__Witness:__ “Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.”
>__Lawyer:__ “But could the patient have still been alive nevertheless?”
>__Witness:__ “Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law somewhere.”
Lisää moista tuomioistuinhupia löytyy [täältä](http://rinkworks.com/said/courtroom.shtml).
(via [Linko](http://www.visakopu.net/linko/))